ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
Robotic proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a hybrid approach.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Short-term surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Standardisation in robotic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Essential Updates in the Surgical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Topics From 2024 to Mid-2026.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Review
- Outcomes of restorative proctectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a matched-cohort analysis of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- A network meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic, open and robotic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA].Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Surgical management of the colorectum in FAP: tailored approaches for optimal outcomes.Familial cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeProctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the definitive surgical treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. While laparoscopic surgery has been widely adopted, robotic surgery has emerged as a promising alternative, particularly for complex pelvic dissection. However, the robotic learning curve presents significant challenges. This study introduces a hybrid approach combining robotic and laparoscopic techniques to leverage the strengths of both, with a focus on the impact of the robotic learning curve and surgical training.
methodsAll patients undergoing hybrid or laparoscopic proctocolectomy with IPAA for ulcerative colitis between 2022 and 2024 were included. Data on patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were collected prospectively. Primary outcomes were operating time and 30-day morbidity. All robotic procedures were performed by a consultant surgeon within their first 100 robotic cases.
resultsA total of 25 patients were included: 14 in the hybrid group and 11 in the laparoscopic group. The median operating time was 300 min for the hybrid approach versus 325 min for the laparoscopic approach. In the hybrid surgery group, between 72 and 90% of the laparoscopic part of the procedure was performed by a supervised surgical trainee.
conclusionsThe hybrid robotic-laparoscopic approach offers potential benefits over pure laparoscopy by reducing operative time and postoperative complications. Additionally, it provides a structured modular training opportunity, allowing surgeons to develop both laparoscopic and robotic skills, particularly during the early stages of their robotic learning curve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.