Observational studyEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025
Conventional Coagulation Tests are a better predictor of mortality than Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays in trauma patients with shock: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeConventional Coagulation Tests (CCTs) and Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays (VHAs) are currently used in guiding trauma resuscitation. However, the role of these tests in predicting mortality is less known. This study aims to analyze both CCTs and VHAs in predicting mortality.
methodsA prospective observational study was conducted on adult trauma patients who presented in shock. They underwent VHA using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM
resultsOut of 8,765 trauma patients screened, 106 were included. Descriptive statistics showed a majority of blunt injuries with road traffic incidents as the predominant mechanism. The median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 24 (IQR 14-34). Mortality rate at 24 h was 9.4% and overall 30-day mortality was 26% (n = 28). Univariable analysis showed that reduced clotting time had better survival (p = 0.005) while prolonged INR, reduced fibrinogen and elevated d-dimer levels were associated with mortality. In multivariable analysis, prolonged INR > 1.66 (AUC 0.74, OR 9.4, 95% CI 2.6-34.1) and prolonged clotting time > 384 s (AUC 0.67, OR 7.4, 95% CI 1.1-51.9) had best prediction of mortality. Overall, CCTs were better at predicting mortality than VHA.
conclusionCCTs, especially INR proved to be a more reliable predictor of mortality compared to VHAs in trauma patients. These findings suggest that CCTs offer better prognostic value, although integrating both testing modalities could potentially enhance overall assessment and management strategies in trauma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40074918What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.