Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40074914›Full record

ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Osseointegration in amputation surgery : Representative studies].

Lisa Stock, Lukas F Seyboldt, Phillip Wilkens, Frank Braatz

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa StockKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und plastische Chirurgie (CUOP),, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Lukas F SeyboldtKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und plastische Chirurgie (CUOP),, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Phillip WilkensPFH Private University of Applied Sciences, Weender Landstraße 3-7, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Frank BraatzKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und plastische Chirurgie (CUOP),, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. frank.braatz@med.uni-goettingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osseointegration is an innovative procedure to improve the mobility and quality of life of amputees by connecting exoprostheses to the bone as a replacement for the conventional socket prosthesis. This article highlights two main approaches: the osseointegrated prosthesis for the rehabilitation of amputees (OPRA) system, which uses a thread-based implant and the integral leg prosthesis (ILP) and osseointegrated prosthetic limb (OPL) systems, which rely on the press-fit method. While osseointegration offers benefits such as better prosthesis fixation and fewer skin problems, there are also challenges, particularly the increased risk of infections. Research and studies have shown that the procedure can substantially improve the quality of life of amputees when used correctly. The systems OPRA, ILP and OPL are analyzed with respect to the effectiveness and complications, noting that complication rates decrease with increasing experience and improved design. Overall, osseointegration represents a promising alternative for amputees who experience discomfort and cannot cope with traditional socket prostheses.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalAmputeesArtificial LimbsOsseointegrationHumansProsthesis DesignQuality of LifeAmputation stumpsArtificial limbsExoskeleton deviceQuality of lifeSurgical Amputation techniques

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.