Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40074866›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025

Identification of candidate genes associated with resistance to aflatoxin production in peanut through genetic mapping and transcriptome analysis.

Dongxin Huai, Li Huang, Xiaomeng Xue, Bolun Yu, Yingbin Ding, Gaorui Jin, Hao Liu, Manish K Pandey, Hari Kishan Sudini, Huaiyong Luo and 13 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Dongxin Huai *Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-2199
Li Huang *Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Xiaomeng XueKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Bolun YuKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Yingbin DingKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Gaorui JinKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Hao LiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, South China Peanut Sub-Center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Crops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Manish K PandeyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Aird Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Hari Kishan SudiniInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Aird Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Huaiyong LuoKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Xiaojing ZhouKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Nian LiuKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Weigang ChenKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Liying YanKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Yuning ChenKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Xin WangKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Qianqian WangKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Yanping KangKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Zhihui WangKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoping ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, South China Peanut Sub-Center of National Center of Oilseed Crops Improvement, Crops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Huifang JiangKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Yong LeiKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China. leiyong@caas.cn.
Boshou LiaoKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China. lboshou@hotmail.com.

Funding

Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences 2024-2060299-089-031Key R&D Program of China 2022YFD1200400Key R&D Program of China 2023YFD1202800National Natural Science Foundation of China 31461143022National Natural Science Foundation of China 32001510National Natural Science Foundation of China 32101708National Natural Science Foundation of China 32161143006National Peanut Industry Technology System Construction CARS-13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageTwo major QTLs qAftA07and qAftB06.2 for peanut aflatoxin production resistance were identified and candidate genes for them were predicted. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is a globally significant oil and economic crop, serving as a primary source of edible oil and protein. Aflatoxin contamination is a main risk factor for peanut food safety and industry development worldwide. The most cost-economic and effective control strategy entails the exploration and utilization of natural resistance in peanut, alongside the development of resistant varieties. However, the underlying mechanism of resistance to aflatoxin production (AP) in peanuts remains elusive. In this study, a RIL population derived from a cross between Zhonghua 10 (susceptible) and ICG 12625 (resistant), was used to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for AP resistance. Overall, seven QTLs associated with AP resistance were mapped on five chromosomes, explaining 6.83-17.86% of phenotypic variance (PVE). Notably, only two major QTLs, namely qAftA07and qAftB06.2, were consistently detected across different environments with 6.83-16.52% PVE. To predict the candidate genes for AP resistance in qAftA07and qAftB06.2, the transcriptome analysis of seeds from parental lines inoculated with Aspergillus flavus were conducted. A total of 175 and 238 candidate genes were respectively identified in qAftA07 and qAftB06.2, encompassing genes with non-synonymous genomic variations as well as differentially expressed genes. Combined with the weighted gene co-expression network analysis, 10 and 11 genes in qAftA07 and qAftB06.2 were characterized showing a high correlation with aflatoxin content, thereby representing the most promising candidate genes within these two QTLs. These results provide valuable insights for future map-based cloning studies targeting candidate genes associated with AP resistance in peanut.

Indexed as

AflatoxinsArachisDisease ResistanceGenes, PlantPlant DiseasesQuantitative Trait LociTranscriptomeAspergillus flavusChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantGene Expression ProfilingPhenotypeAflatoxins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.