Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40074836›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2025

Proteomic characterization of MET-amplified esophageal adenocarcinomas reveals enrichment of alternative splicing- and androgen signaling-related proteins.

Bastian Grothey, Su Ir Lyu, Alexander Quaas, Adrian Georg Simon, Jin-On Jung, Wolfgang Schröder, Christiane J Bruns, Lars M Schiffmann, Felix C Popp, Thomas Schmidt and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bastian Grothey *Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Su Ir Lyu *Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Alexander QuaasFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Adrian Georg SimonFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jin-On JungFaculty of Medicine, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Wolfgang SchröderFaculty of Medicine, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christiane J BrunsFaculty of Medicine, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Lars M SchiffmannFaculty of Medicine, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Felix C PoppFaculty of Medicine, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Thomas SchmidtFaculty of Medicine, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Karl KnipperFaculty of Medicine, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. karl.knipper@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7133-3538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal adenocarcinomas (EACs) represent an evolving tumor entity with high mortality rates. MET amplification is a recurrent driver in EACs and is associated with decreased patient survival. However, the response to MET inhibitors is limited. Recent studies have identified several mechanisms that lead to resistance against MET inhibitors in different tumor entities. Nonetheless, a characterization of additional vulnerable targets beyond MET has not been conducted in MET-amplified EACs.

methodsIn this study, we determined the MET amplification status in a cohort of more than 900 EACs using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and compared the proteomes of MET-amplified (n = 20) versus non-amplified tumors (n = 39) by mass spectrometry.

resultsWe identified a phenotype, present in almost all MET-amplified tumors, which shows an enrichment of alternative RNA splicing, and androgen receptor signaling proteins, as well as decreased patient survival. Additionally, our analyses revealed a negative correlation between MET expression and patient survival in MET-amplified EACs, indicating biological heterogeneity with clinical relevance despite the presence of MET amplification as the predominant oncogenic driver. Furthermore, quantitative immunohistochemical analysis of the inflammatory tumor microenvironment showed that an increased percentage of M2 macrophages is associated with lower overall survival in MET-amplified EACs.

conclusionsOur results provide valuable insights into possible new therapeutic approaches for MET-amplified EACs for further research.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAlternative SplicingEsophageal NeoplasmsProteomicsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metReceptors, AndrogenAgedFemaleGene AmplificationHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiddle AgedProteomeSignal TransductionTumor MicroenvironmentMET protein, humanProteomeProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metReceptors, AndrogenEsophageal adenocarcinomasMET signaling pathwayOncologyProteomicsTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID40074836
PMCPMC11904063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.