SynthesisProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2026
Transperineal laser ablation in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: an updated systematic review and pooled analysis.
Synthesis in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional outcomes and retreatment rates after iTIND implantation in a real-world Italian multicenter cohort: the importance of patient selection.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Treatment Regret in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A Case Series on the Efficacy and Safety of Transperineal Laser Ablation for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStandard surgical options for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [BPH], despite their excellent functional outcomes, are associated with multiple side effects and require general/spinal anesthesia and hospitalization. In this scenario, Transperineal Laser Ablation of the Prostate [TPLA] emerged as an ultra-minimally invasive ejaculation-sparing procedure, showing promising functional results, with a good safety profile. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the current role of TPLA in clinical practice, focusing on operative setting, safety, and efficacy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Literature search was performed on June 12th, 2024 using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases, following the EAU Guidelines Office and the PRISMA statement recommendations. All studies reporting outcomes after TPLA procedures were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Seventeen studies were included in this systematic review, of which 2 RCTs compared TPLA with TURP, 12 prospective and 3 retrospective non-randomized studies (of which 1 comparing TPLA and Prostatic Artery Embolization [PAE]). All procedures were performed using the same EchoLaser
conclusionsTPLA showed promising results both in the short- and mid-term, improving urinary function while preserving sexual function and keeping a good safety profile. Since the evidence available is still limited, larger prospective comparative studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy of TPLA and to adequately compare it to standard endoscopic techniques and other minimally invasive surgical treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40074835What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.