Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40074835›Full record

SynthesisProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2026

Transperineal laser ablation in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: an updated systematic review and pooled analysis.

Andrea Alberti, Mattia Lo Re, Rossella Nicoletti, Paolo Polverino, Anna Cadenar, Elena Ciaralli, Francesca Solazzi, Beatrice Giustozzi, Francesco Sessa, Anna Rivetti and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Andrea Alberti *Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8988-0133
Mattia Lo Re *Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Rossella NicolettiUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Paolo PolverinoUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Anna CadenarUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Elena CiaralliUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Francesca SolazziUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Beatrice GiustozziUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Francesco SessaUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Anna RivettiUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Riccardo CampiUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5237-0888
Arcangelo SebastianelliUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4073-8339
Sergio SerniUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Mauro GacciUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy. maurogacci@yahoo.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStandard surgical options for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [BPH], despite their excellent functional outcomes, are associated with multiple side effects and require general/spinal anesthesia and hospitalization. In this scenario, Transperineal Laser Ablation of the Prostate [TPLA] emerged as an ultra-minimally invasive ejaculation-sparing procedure, showing promising functional results, with a good safety profile. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the current role of TPLA in clinical practice, focusing on operative setting, safety, and efficacy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Literature search was performed on June 12th, 2024 using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases, following the EAU Guidelines Office and the PRISMA statement recommendations. All studies reporting outcomes after TPLA procedures were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Seventeen studies were included in this systematic review, of which 2 RCTs compared TPLA with TURP, 12 prospective and 3 retrospective non-randomized studies (of which 1 comparing TPLA and Prostatic Artery Embolization [PAE]). All procedures were performed using the same EchoLaser

conclusionsTPLA showed promising results both in the short- and mid-term, improving urinary function while preserving sexual function and keeping a good safety profile. Since the evidence available is still limited, larger prospective comparative studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy of TPLA and to adequately compare it to standard endoscopic techniques and other minimally invasive surgical treatments.

Indexed as

Laser TherapyProstatic HyperplasiaHumansMalePerineumTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.