ArticleScientific reports2025
Study on the predictive value of preoperative CT features for the mitotic index of GIST based on the nomogram.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of nomograms and predictive tools in gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Preoperative Prediction of High Mitotic Count in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Using CT Features and Serologic Indicators: An Interpretable Model with Multicenter External Validation.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Can CT Radiomics Predict the Ki-67 Index of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs)? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to construct a Nomogram based on preoperative CT features to predict the mitotic index in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and to establish preoperative risk stratification. The constructed nomogram prediction model is targeted towards guiding preoperative risk stratification, facilitating the provision of rational drug administration regimens, and tailoring appropriate surgical plans for personalized treatment. The imaging and pathological data of 250 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Shanxi Provincial hospital from January 2019 to January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the pathological data, the patients were divided into high mitotic index and low mitotic index, and were divided into a training group (n = 176) and a validation group (n = 74) according to a stratified sampling ratio of 7:3. In the training group, statistically significant variables were screened out by univariate analysis for multivariate logistic regression analysis, and independent risk factors were screened out and a Nomogram prediction model was constructed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to evaluate the model discrimination, and the predicted probability risk was stratified by the optimal cutoff value. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test (HL test) was performed, and the calibration curve was drawn by Bootstrap repeated sampling 1000 times to evaluate the model consistency. Finally, the clinical application value of the prediction model was evaluated by the decision curve analysis (DCA). There were no significant differences in the distribution of clinical characteristics and CT features between the training group and the validation group ( P>0.05). Univariate analysis showed that the differences in tumor size, tumor site, boundary, calcification, liquefaction/necrosis, morphological characteristics, growth pattern, and ulceration were statistically significant (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis screened out tumor size (GIST ≤ 2 cm, P = 0.018; GIST 2-5 cm, p = 0.009; GIST 5-10 cm, P = 0.017), liquefaction/necrosis (P = 0.002), and morphological characteristics (P = 0.002) as independent risk factors for high mitotic index. The Nomogram was established based on these three factors. The area under the curve (AUC) of the training group and the validation group of the model were 0.851 (95%CI: 0.793-0.91) and 0.836 (95%CI: 0.735-0.937), the specificity was 0.696 and 0.735, and the sensitivity was 0.869 and 0.760, respectively. The HL test had good calibration (training group P = 0.461, validation group P = 0.822), indicating that the predicted risk was consistent with the actual risk. The DCA also showed good clinical practicality. The Nomogram prediction model that incorporates preoperative CT features of tumor size, liquefaction/necrosis, and morphological characteristics can effectively predict the number of mitotic figures in gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and can perform effective preoperative risk stratification to guide clinical decision-making and personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.