Trial reportScientific reports2025
Examination of effect and responder to real-time auditory feedback during overground gait for stroke: a randomized cross-over study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cortical mapping of real-time ultrasound-imaging visual feedback for ankle dorsiflexion in patients after stroke: a fNIRS study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Differences of Physical Functions and Gait Kinematics in Selection of Strategies for Increasing Gait Speed in Older Adults: A Cross-sectional Study.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Real-time auditory feedback for overground gait was developed to simulate realistic gait practice. This study aimed to assess the effects of different auditory feedback conditions and identify patients with stroke who might benefit from auditory feedback based on physical function. Twenty patients with stroke participated in three 6-min gait trials: no feedback (control), auditory feedback focused on increasing ankle plantar flexion (ankle trial), and auditory feedback on increasing lower-leg extension angle (leg trial). Physical function was evaluated using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB); gait function was assessed through gait speed, cadence, stride length, and joint motion using inertial sensors before and after each trial. Gait speed (P = 0.001), stride length (P < 0.001), ankle plantar flexion (P = 0.014), and leg extension angles (P = 0.020) improved significantly over time. Interaction effects between time and trial were observed for stride length (P = 0.001) and leg extension angle (P = 0.003). Among the auditory feedback trials, stride length (P = 0.012), length-time difference (P = 0.003), and leg extension angle (P = 0.008) increased significantly in the leg trial compared with the control trial. SPPB scores were independently associated with the benefit from the leg trial (odds ratio: 2.217, 95% confidence interval: 1.152-4.266, P = 0.017). Real-time auditory feedback focused on leg extension angle during gait may enhance gait speed by improving leg extension and optimizing spatial gait strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.