ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-indexes decision-making using PL-BWM and probabilistic linguistic three-way TOPSIS methods: a case study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A method for multi-criteria decision making with probabilistic linguistic term based on cloud TOPSIS.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs) provide a flexible tool to express linguistic preferences, which allow decision-makers to label linguistic information with different probabilities. In this paper, the theory of PLTSs is developed and a decision-making system based on PLTS is proposed to address multi-indexes decision-making problems. A new normalized model of probabilistic linguistic term element (PLTEs) is created by integrating three emotional factors of decision-makers (DMs), which can fully express the emotional attitude of DMs. Then a novel best-worst method (BWM) is put forward, termed PL-BWM, based on PLTS. The use of PL-BWM can fully reflects the preference information of DMs, and accurately describes the importance level of the indexes. The Jensen-Shannon divergence is used to obtain the index weights by merging PL-BWM-based subjective weights and exponential probabilistic linguistic fuzzy entropy-based objective weights. Inspired by three-way decision-making, a third middle reference point is introduced in classical two-way TOPSIS, dividing the scheme set into two parts to accurately locate the position of each scheme, which can achieve perfect results, overcoming the potentially ambiguous ranking of the classic two-way TOPSIS. The median evaluation is constructed as the third middle reference point to obtain the probabilistic linguistic three-way TOPSIS method. The practical implementation and the robustness of the new method are assessed on an optimal green suppliers of magnetic materials selection problem. A comparison of performance shows that the proposed method is logically consistent and can provide more suitable results than existing ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.