Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40074790›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Disease detection on exterior surfaces of buildings using deep learning in China.

You Chen, Dayao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

You ChenSchool of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, 11700, Malaysia.
Dayao LiSchool of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, 11700, Malaysia. chenyou13277035613@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban infrastructure, particularly in ageing cities, faces significant challenges in maintaining building aesthetics and structural integrity. Traditional methods for detecting diseases on building exteriors, such as manual inspections, are often inefficient, costly, and prone to errors, leading to incomplete assessments and delayed maintenance actions. This study explores the application of advanced deep learning techniques to accurately detect diseases on the exterior surfaces of buildings in urban environments, aiming to enhance detection efficiency and accuracy while providing a real-time monitoring solution that can be widely implemented in infrastructure health management. The research implemented a deep learning model that improves feature extraction and accuracy by integrating DenseNet blocks and Swin-Transformer prediction heads, trained and validated using a dataset of 289 high-resolution images collected from diverse urban environments in China. Data augmentation techniques improved the model's robustness against varying conditions. The proposed model achieved a high accuracy rate of 84.42%, a recall of 77.83%, and an F1 score of 0.81, with a detection speed of 55 frames per second. These metrics demonstrate the model's effectiveness in accurately identifying complex damage patterns, such as minute cracks, even within noisy urban environments, significantly outperforming traditional methods. This study highlights the potential of deep learning to transform urban maintenance strategies by offering a practical solution for the real-time detection of diseases on building exteriors, ultimately enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of urban infrastructure monitoring and contributing to improved maintenance practices and timely interventions.

Indexed as

Deep LearningChinaCitiesHumansBuilding disease detectionModel trainingReal-time monitoringYOLOv5 algorithm

Identifiers

PMID40074790
PMCPMC11904203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.