ArticleScientific reports2025
Disease detection on exterior surfaces of buildings using deep learning in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intelligent Recognition of Building Facade Defects: A Multilevel Review from Visual Perception to Engineering Operations and Maintenance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Anti-interference framework for weakly supervised thermal defect segmentation on high-rise building facades.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automated detection of fetal vascular malperfusion via data augmentation and algorithm improvement.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Determinants and governance of unused rural residential bases in the context of Rural Revitalisation in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban infrastructure, particularly in ageing cities, faces significant challenges in maintaining building aesthetics and structural integrity. Traditional methods for detecting diseases on building exteriors, such as manual inspections, are often inefficient, costly, and prone to errors, leading to incomplete assessments and delayed maintenance actions. This study explores the application of advanced deep learning techniques to accurately detect diseases on the exterior surfaces of buildings in urban environments, aiming to enhance detection efficiency and accuracy while providing a real-time monitoring solution that can be widely implemented in infrastructure health management. The research implemented a deep learning model that improves feature extraction and accuracy by integrating DenseNet blocks and Swin-Transformer prediction heads, trained and validated using a dataset of 289 high-resolution images collected from diverse urban environments in China. Data augmentation techniques improved the model's robustness against varying conditions. The proposed model achieved a high accuracy rate of 84.42%, a recall of 77.83%, and an F1 score of 0.81, with a detection speed of 55 frames per second. These metrics demonstrate the model's effectiveness in accurately identifying complex damage patterns, such as minute cracks, even within noisy urban environments, significantly outperforming traditional methods. This study highlights the potential of deep learning to transform urban maintenance strategies by offering a practical solution for the real-time detection of diseases on building exteriors, ultimately enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of urban infrastructure monitoring and contributing to improved maintenance practices and timely interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.