ArticleScientific reports2025
Extremely low frequency magnetic field distracts zebrafish from a visual cognitive task.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human Responses to Magnetic and Hypomagnetic Fields: Available Evidence and Potential Risks for Deep Space Travel.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electromagnetic fields emitted from overhead power lines and subsea cables are widely regarded to be a disruptive factor for animals using the natural magnetic field as orientation cue for guiding their directed movements. However, it is not known if anthropogenic electromagnetic fields also have the potential to disturb animals attending to information from other sensory modalities. To find out, we trained adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) individually to perform avoidance behavior in response to a visual signal (green LED light spot), which in the exposure group was presented simultaneously with a sinusoidally changing magnetic field (0.3 Hz, group A: 0.015 mT, group B: 0.06 mT). Despite the salience of the visual signal, which was both sufficient and necessary to elicit conditioned avoidance responses, the 0.06 mT magnetic condition had a negative impact on learning performance and response behavior. This suggests that extremely low frequency technical magnetic fields of Earth strength amplitude can act as cross-modal distractor that diverts the attention of animals away from environmentally relevant cues based on nonmagnetic sensory modalities. Our research highlights the need to study the role of anthropogenic magnetic fields as sensory pollutant beyond the scope of magnetic orientation behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.