ArticleScientific reports2025
Association between aortomesenteric angle and symptomatic spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between the aortomesenteric angle (AMA) and the occurrence and image characteristics of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD). This is a single-centre retrospective case-control study. Between January 1 2013 and December 13 2022, consecutive patients with computed tomography angiography (CTA) confirmed symptomatic SISMAD were included. Controls were selected with 1:1 matches in patients with CTA of the superior mesenteric artery but without SISMAD using propensity score matching for age, sex, and body mass index. Patient demographics, symptoms, and dissection characteristics were recorded. Logistic regression was performed to assess the association between AMA and SISMAD. The study also evaluated the association between AMA and SISMAD using restricted cubic splines (RCS). The associations between AMA and the characteristics of SISMAD were evaluated. One hundred and five SISMAD patients (mean age, 54.8 ± 8.9 years) were included, and most patients were male (87.6%). Univariable analysis revealed hypertension, hyperlipemia, and AMA (all p < .001) were associated with SISMAD. An increasing AMA (adjusted OR, 1.03 per 1 ° increase in angulation) and hypertension (adjusted OR, 3.52) were identified as risk factors for SISMAD. Compared with small AMA level (< 50°), intermediate (50-71°) (adjusted OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.23-5.58; p = .013) and large angle level (> 71°) (adjusted OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 2.07-9.82; p < .001) were significantly associated with SISMAD. No obvious associations between AMA and the SISMAD imaging characteristics were found. Greater AMA and hypertension were independent risk factors for SISMAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.