ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of a rapid malaria LAMP-MS assay for diagnosis of malaria infections.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- C1QB-Mediated Immunopathology in a Murine Malaria Model: A Multi-Omics Validation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targeting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Five Hot Topics in Tropical Medicine: 2025.Infectious disease reports · 2026Review
- Intracellular Parasitic Infections Caused byVaccines · 2025Review
- Rapid and Multiplex Diagnosis of Malaria Using Chelex-100 Extraction and LAMP-MS Assay.Bio-protocol · 2025Article
- Development of the MTB/IC LAMP-MS Assay for Rapid Detection ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malaria remains a critical global health concern, especially in tropical and subtropical regions, where it causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Current diagnostic methods, such as microscopy and PCR-based assays, are reliable but often impractical in resource-limited settings due to their dependency on complex equipment and skilled personnel. This study developed a novel malaria diagnostic platform by combining the Chelex-100/boiling DNA extraction method with a Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification-MicroScanner (LAMP-MS) assay. The Chelex-100/boiling method is simpler and more cost-effective than conventional DNA extraction processes, making it suitable for use in resource-limited settings. The LAMP-MS assay enables multiplex detection through a microchip design with four chambers. Each chamber of the microchip is preloaded with specific primers targeting Pan, Plasmodium falciparum (Pf), Plasmodium vivax (Pv), and an internal control, minimizing non-specific amplification in multiplex LAMP reactions. In a clinical evaluation of 260 samples, the assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.5% for the Pan target and 100% for the Pf-specific target in the 80 Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) clinical samples. Similarly, for the 80 Plasmodium vivax (Pv) clinical samples, the assay achieved a sensitivity of 95% for the Pan target and 94% for the Pv-specific target. Notably, in the 100 non-infected clinical samples, the assay exhibited 100% specificity, with no false positives observed. These findings suggest that LAMP-MS is a rapid and reliable alternative to PCR-based methods, especially in resource-limited environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.