Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40074729›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Zebrafish identification with deep CNN and ViT architectures using a rolling training window.

Jason Puchalla, Aaron Serianni, Bo Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jason Puchalla *Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA. puchalla@princeton.edu.
Aaron Serianni *Department of Mathematics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Bo DengDepartment of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zebrafish are widely used in vertebrate studies, yet minimally invasive individual tracking and identification in the lab setting remain challenging due to complex and time-variable conditions. Advancements in machine learning, particularly neural networks, offer new possibilities for developing simple and robust identification protocols that adapt to changing conditions. We demonstrate a rolling window training technique suitable for use with open-source convolutional neural networks (CNN) and vision transformers (ViT) that shows promise in robustly identifying individual maturing zebrafish in groups over several weeks. The technique provides a high-fidelity method for monitoring the temporally evolving zebrafish classes, potentially significantly reducing the need for new training images in both CNN and ViT architectures. To understand the success of the CNN classifier and inform future real-time identification of zebrafish, we analyzed the impact of shape, pattern, and color by modifying the images of the training set and compared the test results with other prevalent machine learning models.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerZebrafishAnimalsDeep LearningMachine LearningConvolutional neural networksMachine learningRolling windowTime evolvingVision transformer

Identifiers

PMID40074729
PMCPMC11903894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.