Observational studyThoracic cancer2025
Comparison of Early Functional Recovery Following Triportal Robot-Assisted and Uniportal Video-Assisted Segmentectomy in Patients With Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Observational study in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robot-assisted versus video-assisted surgery for early functional recovery in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-based matching studies.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- RoboticJournal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Impact of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery on efficacy and quality of life in patients with pulmonary opacities: a propensity score-matched analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRobot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) is more precise and flexible than video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. This study compared the early postoperative functional recovery of patients who underwent triportal RATS with that of patients who underwent uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (UVATS) for segmentectomy.
methodsThis observational, prospective study included 172 patients with clinical stage I or II peripheral NSCLC who underwent RATS or UVATS segmentectomy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance differences between groups. The functional recovery data were collected during the first 4 weeks after discharge via portable devices and questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, Christensen Fatigue Scale, MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, and Leicester Cough Questionnaire).
resultsAfter PSM, the baseline characteristics were consistent between the groups. RATS was associated with shorter operation time and lower total drainage volume compared to UVATS. However, RATS was associated with more cases of severe postoperative pain. Despite this, patients who underwent RATS recovered well, showed good short-term outcomes in fatigue and physical function, and experienced few postoperative adverse events. The differences in average daily step count and sleep duration were not significant. In terms of global health status (GHS), RATS was slightly but nonsignificantly advantageous.
conclusionsIn the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway, triportal RATS has potential benefits in terms of perioperative and early postoperative functional recovery after segmentectomy.
trial registrationBiomedical Research Ethics Committee of Shandong Province: 2022-580; Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300067977.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.