Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40074548›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology letters2025

Mycorrhizal inoculation success depends on soil health and crop productivity.

Ido Rog, Marcel G A van der Heijden, Franz Bender, Raphaël Boussageon, Antonin Lambach, Klaus Schlaeppi, Natacha Bodenhausen, Stefanie Lutz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ido RogPlant-Soil Interactions, Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9120-3617
Marcel G A van der HeijdenPlant-Soil Interactions, Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland.
Franz BenderPlant-Soil Interactions, Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland.
Raphaël BoussageonPlant-Soil Interactions, Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5858-8105
Antonin LambachPlant-Soil Interactions, Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland.
Klaus SchlaeppiPlant Microbe Interactions, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Natacha BodenhausenDepartment of Soil Sciences, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), 5070 Frick, Switzerland.
Stefanie LutzPlant-Soil Interactions, Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3845-0862

Funding

Gebert Rüf Foundation GRS-072/17Swiss National Science Foundation 40IN40_215832/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the human population grows, so does the demand for higher agricultural yields. As a result, agricultural intensification practices are increasing while soil health is often declining. Integrating the benefits of microorganisms into agricultural management systems can reduce the need for external resource inputs. One particular group of plant symbionts that can help plants to acquire additional nutrients and promote plant growth are arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). The application of AMF in agricultural practice has been hampered by the variability in the success of mycorrhizal inoculation and the lack of consistency in different fields. Here, we tested whether it is possible to predict mycorrhizal inoculation success based on soil health and productivity. We hypothesized higher inoculation success on fields with poor soil health because in such fields, mycorrhiza can improve nutrient uptake and biotic resistance to pathogens. We calculated a soil health index by aggregating six biotic and abiotic variables from 54 maize fields and tested its correlation with the mycorrhizal growth response (MGR). The MGR was linked to soil health and significantly higher in less healthy soils and less productive fields. This implies that soil inoculation with AMF has most potential in fields with poor soil health and low productivity. Based on these findings, we propose a soil health framework that highlights the potential benefits of AMF field inoculation.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalMycorrhizaeSoilSoil MicrobiologyZea maysAgricultureCrop ProductionSymbiosisSoilarbuscular mycorrhizal fungicrop productivityfield inoculationsmycorrhizal growth responsesoil healthsustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID40074548
PMCPMC11934917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.