ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical haematology2024
Analyte heterogeneity analysis as a possible potency parameter for MSC.
Review in Best practice & research. Clinical haematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Full-field analysis indicates late reperfusion therapy broadens and mechanically smooths the borderzone during post-infarction inflammation.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Nonlinear Bivariate Associations and Mononuclear Cell-Type-Specific Expression Level Differences in the STING Signalling Pathway.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC) have been transplanted for therapeutic purposes with inconsistent results. MSC preparations are heterogeneous, and this person-to-person heterogeneity may account for the variable clinical outcomes. Additionally, the mechanisms of therapeutic action for MSC are unclear which confounds attempts to understand and identify factors that may account for variable clinical results. Here, we report our analysis of MSC preparations for the expression levels of molecules that have been hypothesized to mediate MSC function. Although most of the analytes assessed demonstrated little divergent expression, several molecules were found with enhanced heterogeneity both within individual MSC preparations and among MSC preparations from the sample of multiple sclerosis patients. The variable expression of these molecules may relate to the therapeutic heterogeneity of MSC. Additionally, we found a novel set of molecules that were highly intercorrelated in MSC. The tight association of this group of molecules may represent an invariant molecular organization that is integral to MSC activity. The precise analysis of molecular expression levels in MSC has the potential to answer concerns about variable therapeutic effects of MSC transplantation as well as to understand the mechanism of clinical effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.