ArticleEndocrine journal2025
Status of temozolomide use without insurance coverage in patients with aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.
Article in Endocrine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 2017 World Health Organization classification described aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) as "a tumor with strong invasiveness and rapid growth, which is difficult to treat with surgery, radiation therapy, or drug therapy," which remains a challenge in the treatment of pituitary tumors. Currently, temozolomide (TMZ) is the first-line treatment for aggressive PitNET. However, it is not yet covered by insurance in Japan. Additionally, O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) expression can lead to treatment resistance, further complicating treatment selection. We previously demonstrated the effectiveness of combination therapy with capecitabine (CAPTEM) in several cases of aggressive PitNETs. The present study described our experiences with TMZ in 13 patients with aggressive PitNETs (including four patients administered CAPTEM). Pathological examination revealed eight corticotroph, four lactotroph, and one somatotroph tumors. Of these, seven patients are still receiving treatment, and six patients have terminated treatment. The reasons for discontinuation were poor efficacy (three patients), financial reasons (two patients), and patient preference (one patient). No patients required treatment discontinuation owing to adverse events. Furthermore, one case of a lactotroph tumor, which achieved remission with CAPTEM but was discontinued after three years for financial reasons, remains in remission on imaging and maintained normal PRL levels for 15 months after discontinuation. The most significant issue is off-label use. Concern exists that financial constraints may prevent future patients from using TMZ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.