ArticleAnaesthesia2025
Provision of peri-operative patient blood management strategies in the UK: a national survey of practice.
Article in Anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn UK hospitals, it is unclear how organisational structures are arranged to support effective implementation of peri-operative blood management practice strategies. The aim of this study was to conduct a national survey of organisations to describe local practices of peri-operative patient blood management and infrastructure availability in the UK.
methodsA series of benchmarking standards was developed using recommendations informed by national standards, relevant literature and an expert panel. Through the Research and Audit Federation of Trainees networks, 143 hospitals were approached to participate. The pre-piloted survey was conducted online between January and February 2023.
resultsResponses were received from 123 hospitals across 74 NHS Trusts and health boards. Formal elective anaemia pathways were not reported in 37/123 (30%) sites. There was considerable inter-site variation in interventional thresholds for anaemia and screening tests. A variety of oral iron regimens were reported, from once-daily dosing in 41/85 (48%) sites, to three times a day dosing in 14/85 (16%). Ferric carboxymaltose was the preparation used most frequently at sites that administered intravenous iron (61/113, 54%). There was variation between hospitals and surgical specialties in the use of tranexamic acid with 49/122 (39%) hospitals reporting a policy for the use of peri-operative tranexamic acid. For sites that performed major surgery routinely (irrespective of specialty), 20/112 (18%) included tranexamic acid in operating theatre safety briefings. Point-of-care coagulation testing was available at 62/123 (50%) sites. DISCUSSION: Our findings show considerable heterogeneity in peri-operative patient blood management strategies and supporting infrastructure availability across the UK. There is a pressing need for hospitals to review pathways of care offered to surgical patients and implement national recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.