Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40074287›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2025

Exploring considerations for becoming a GP practice owner: a qualitative study.

Hinda A Stegeman, Manna A Alma, Hanneke Pm Vervoort, Vivian van Vliet, Nynke D Scherpbier, Daniëlle Mc Jansen, Marjolein Y Berger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hinda A StegemanBusiness Administration, Primary and Long Term Care, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands h.a.stegeman@umcg.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1742-9566
Manna A AlmaApplied Health Research, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-2713
Hanneke Pm VervoortSocial Psychology, Primary and Long Term Care, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0274-114X
Vivian van VlietGeneral Practice, Primary and Long Term Care, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Nynke D ScherpbierGeneral Practice, Primary and Long Term Care, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4818-3382
Daniëlle Mc JansenBusiness Administration, Primary and Long Term Care, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2654-1038
Marjolein Y BergerBusiness Administration, Primary and Long Term Care, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9906-3666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practice owners are responsible for access to care 24 hours a day, but they can struggle to find associates or successors. Fewer practice owners means that the core value, continuity of care (COC), is at risk. However, little is known about the career considerations of young GPs and barriers and facilitators to become practice owners.

aimTo explore the considerations of GPs for becoming a practice owner. DESIGN &

settingA qualitative study of GP trainees, freelance and salaried GPs, practice owners, and ex-practice owners in the north of The Netherlands.

methodNinety GPs were purposively recruited for focus groups and interviews, which were audio and video-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically.

resultsBecoming a practice owner results from a complex interplay between professional, personal, external, and process-related factors, often over an extended period. Participants indicated that COC, autonomy, and personal development had predominantly positive impacts on decisions about practice ownership. Factors that negatively affected considerations included work-life balance, ultimate responsibility, negative role models, unappealing practices, (un)preparedness, and issues with the process. Of note, non-practice owners felt that practice ownership could not be discussed.

conclusionModifications to perceived behavioural control and subjective norms are needed, together with an open dialogue among GPs about practice ownership and alternative models. Our findings offer a foundation for further prospective quantitative research into efforts designed to address the shortage of practice owners in The Netherlands and other countries. This could uncover universal and country-specific themes.

Indexed as

continuity of patient caregeneral practicegeneral practitionerspractice organisationprimary healthcarequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID40074287
PMCPMC12728838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.