ArticleLupus science & medicine2025
Metabolomic analysis suggests thiamine monophosphate as a potential marker for mesenchymal stem cell transplantation outcomes in patients with SLE.
Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Untargeted Metabolomics Reveals Raw Material Geographic Origin as a Key Factor Shaping the Quality of Ginger-Derived Exosome-like Nanovesicles.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Toward the Clinical Translation of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Small Molecule Regulation of Thrombomodulin Enhances Therapeutic Efficacy.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Article
- The paradoxical role of stem cells in osteosarcoma: from pathogenesis to therapeutic breakthroughs.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Multi-omics-driven biomarker discovery in autoimmune diseases: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this research is to identify metabolic markers associated with successful treatment by evaluating the effect of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation (MSCT) on the metabolic profiles of patients with SLE.
methodsPlasma samples were collected from 20 patients with SLE before and after MSCT. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to distinguish pretreatment and post-treatment groups and pathway analysis for identifying involved metabolic pathways. Clinical variables were monitored with a median follow-up time of 180 days. Pearson correlation and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis were employed to associate metabolite changes with clinical outcomes and to predict treatment success.
resultsWe detected 18 121 metabolites, with 1152 showing significant changes post-treatment, which could be clearly distinguished between pretreatment and post-treatment groups through PCA. Pathway analysis indicated involvement in riboflavin and thiamine metabolism. Clinical improvements were observed at a median follow-up time of 180 days after MSCT, including decreased SLE Disease Activity Index scores, urine protein/creatinine ratios, and erythrocyte sedimentation rates, along with increased levels of complement C3 and C4, haemoglobin, and platelets. Pearson correlation indicated that specific metabolite changes were associated with clinical improvements, particularly increases in thiamine monophosphate (TMP) and asiaticoside levels. ROC analysis identified TMP level changes as the most predictive of treatment success, with a 35% increase indicating a good response to MSCT.
conclusionThis study concludes that TMP is a potential biomarker that can predict the efficacy of MSCT in treating SLE, providing valuable insights for clinical practice and further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.