ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
Evaluation of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale for monitoring paediatric injury patients at a zonal referral hospital in Northern Tanzania.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInjuries are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among paediatric populations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) is a commonly used tool to assess functional recovery. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PSFS for monitoring paediatric injury patients at a zonal referral hospital in Northern Tanzania.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre paediatric injury registry (November 2020 to June 2024) and included patients under 18 years treated for injuries at a zonal referral hospital in Northern Tanzania. Key outcomes were in-hospital mortality and injury-related morbidity, assessed using the PSFS and Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended Paediatric (GOS-E Ped). The PSFS's reliability was tested with Cronbach's alpha, its smallest meaningful change was calculated and its correlation with GOS-E Ped was analysed using Spearman's rank.
resultsAmong 1000 paediatric injury patients, the mortality rate was 6.6%. PSFS mean scores improved from 4.3 at discharge to 6.5 at 2 weeks and 9.0 at 3 months post hospital discharge. The PSFS showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha: 0.90). A moderate negative correlation was found between PSFS and GOS-E Ped at 3 months (Spearman's ρ: -0.74). The minimally clinically important difference was 2.7, with a sensitivity of 0.73, specificity of 0.72 and an area under the curve of 0.83.
conclusionThe PSFS was found to be a valid, reliable and responsive tool for assessing functional changes in paediatric injury patients, demonstrating strong internal consistency. The findings support its use to measure morbidity in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.