ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2025
The Effect of Repair Materials and Surface Treatments on the Shear Bond Strength of 3D-Printed Provisional Restoration.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chairside Repair of Provisional Restorative Materials: Effects of Material Type, Repair Protocol, and Thermocycling on Shear Bond Strength.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Repair bond strength of composite resin to additively manufactured permanent resin materials: a comparative evaluation of light-cure, self-cure, and dual-cure universal adhesives.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDespite the emergence of numerous three-dimensional (3D) printed provisional resin, there are no conclusive guidelines for repairing them. This study aims to investigate the effects of different repair materials and surface treatments on the shear bond strength of 3D-printed provisional resin. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 180 3D-printed resin specimens underwent six surface treatments: no surface treatment (control), silicon carbide paper (SP), sandblasting with aluminum oxide (SB), SP followed by SB (SP + SB), SP with bonding agent (SP + BD), and SB with bonding agent (SB + BD). Each group was repaired with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), Bis-acryl, and flowable composite resin (FCR). The shear bond strength of the bonded specimens was tested using a universal testing machine and the mode of failure was examined with stereomicroscope. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess normal distribution, and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA;
resultsTwo-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant interaction between repair materials and surface treatments in relation to the shear bond strength of 3D-printed resin (
conclusionRepair materials and surface treatments play an important role in repairing 3D-printed resin. PMMA and composite resin-based repair materials require both sandblast and a chemical bonding agent, while Bis-acryl-based repair materials only need sandblasting to improve the shear bond strength.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.