Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40073917›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2025

Association of catechol-O-methyltransferase genetic polymorphism with neuromodulation treatment response in women with fecal or urinary incontinence.

Maria E Florian-Rodriguez, Holly E Richter, Megan U Carnes, Halina Zyczynski, Emily S Lukacz, Anthony Visco, Lily Arya, Vivian Sung, Donna Mazloomdoost, Marie G Gantz and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria E Florian-RodriguezObstetrics & Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Electronic address: Maria.Florian-Rodriguez@UTSouthwestern.edu.
Holly E RichterObstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL.
Megan U CarnesSocial, Statistical, & Environmental Sciences, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Halina ZyczynskiObstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, and Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Emily S LukaczDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Anthony ViscoObstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Lily AryaObstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Vivian SungObstetrics & Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Donna MazloomdoostGynecologic Health and Disease Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD.
Marie G GantzSocial, Statistical, & Environmental Sciences, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network

Funding

Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Data Coordinating Center Administrative Supplement: ODSS CDE FundingU24HD069031 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI MARIE G GANTZ · 2016 to 2026
$35.8M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Data Coordinating Center (U01)U01HD069031 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI GANTZ, MARIE G · 2011 to 2015
$19.7M
UNC Pelvic Floor Disorders Research CollaborativeU10HD041267 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VISCO, ANTHONY G · 2001 to 2015
$5.0M
Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkU10HD054214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LUKACZ, EMILY S. · 2006 to 2015
$3.3M
Brown/WIH Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Site (UG1)UG1HD069013 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI Vivian W Sung · 2016 to 2026
$3.1M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network 2021UG1HD054241 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI David Dwight Rahn · 2016 to 2026
$3.0M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Sites (UG1)UG1HD069010 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Heidi S Harvie · 2016 to 2026
$3.0M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Site Application: The San Diego PelvicFloor ConsortiumUG1HD054214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI EMILY S. LUKACZ, Shawn A Menefee · 2016 to 2026
$2.9M
Duke University Medical Center (DUMC) Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN) Clinical SiteUG1HD041267 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NAZEMA Y SIDDIQUI · 2016 to 2026
$2.8M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Sites (U10)U10HD069010 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ARYA, LILY A · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Brown/WIH Pelvic Floor Disorders Network SiteU10HD069013 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI SUNG, VIVIAN W · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
Pittsburgh Pelvic Floor Research ProgramU10HD069006 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ZYCZYNSKI, HALINA M · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD069031NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041267NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054214NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD069006NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD069010NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD069013NICHD NIH HHS U24 HD069031NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD041261NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD041267NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD054214NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD054241NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069006NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069010NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior studies have failed to demonstrate clinical or statistical difference in fecal incontinence (FI) symptom improvement with neuromodulation by percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation vs sham. The results of these studies may be indicative of a placebo or sham effect and led us to investigate possible genetic biomarkers of placebo response among women with FI.

objectiveTo evaluate the relationship between response to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation or sham and genetic polymorphisms associated with placebo response in women with FI. Findings were validated using an independent cohort of women treated for urgency urinary incontinence with sacral neuromodulation. STUDY

designBlood specimens were utilized from a subset of women in the Neuromodulation for Accidental Bowel Leakage trial who provided blood samples and consented to their use in future studies (N=96). DNA was extracted and genotyping was performed on single nucleotide polymorphisms (previously associated with placebo response in the following genes: catechol-O-methyltransferase, tryptophan hydroxylase-2, brain-derived neurotropic factor, fatty acid amide hydrolase, mu-opiod receptors. An additive linear regression interaction model adjusted for body mass index, race, baseline fecal incontinence episodes or St. Mark's score was used to identify single nucleotide polymorphism by treatment interaction effects significantly associated with change from baseline in St. Mark's score after a 12-week intervention and secondary outcomes. In the absence of significant interaction, single nucleotide polymorphism main effects were tested. Replication of the findings was assessed with an independent cohort of women participating in a randomized trial of urgency urinary incontinence sacral neuromodulation vs onabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of urgency urinary incontinence.

resultsThere were no differences in age, body mass index, fecal incontinence episodes, or St. Mark's score at baseline or follow-up between percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (n=64) vs sham (n=32) participants. There was a significant interaction (P<.1) between the catechol-O-methyltransferase single nucleotide polymorphism and treatment group for improvement in St. Mark's score (interaction P=.02), improvement in fecal incontinence episodes (interaction P=.01), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (interaction P=.06). Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation treated participants with the catechol-O-methyltransferase Met allele had the greatest improvements (St. Mark's score improvement: 1.72, 95% confidence interval=[-0.04 to 3.49], P=.06; fecal incontinence episode improvement: 2.36 episodes per week, 95% confidence interval=[0.97-3.75], P=.001; and Patient Global Impression of Improvement: odds ratio (OR)=2.00; 95% confidence interval=[0.96-4.14], P=.06). There was no association between catechol-O-methyltransferase and treatment response in sham treated participants. No significant interaction or main effects were observed for other single nucleotide polymorphisms. In an independent study of urinary incontinence, there were positive significant associations for Patient Global Impression of Improvement urinary leak (OR 2.41, 95% confidence interval =[1.27-4.55], P=.007) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement bladder function (OR 2.10, 95% confidence interval =[1.10-4.01], P=.03 with the Met allele in women treated with sacral neuromodulation . No association was seen in the onabotulinumtoxinA group.

conclusionUnexpectedly, women who were homozygous for the catechol-O-methyltransferase Met allele (Met/Met) had a significantly higher likelihood of responding to FI treatment via neuromodulation by percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, but not to sham treatment. This finding was confirmed in a separate study, which found that UI treatment response to neuromodulation by sacral neuromodulation was significantly more likely in women with the catechol-O-methyltransferase Met allele (Met/Met) genotype.

Indexed as

Catechol O-MethyltransferaseElectric Stimulation TherapyFecal IncontinencePolymorphism, Single NucleotideTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationUrinary IncontinenceAdultAgedAmidohydrolasesFatty Acid Amide HydrolasesFemaleGenotypeHumansMiddle AgedPlacebo EffectReceptors, Opioid, muAmidohydrolasesCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCOMT protein, humanFatty Acid Amide HydrolasesOPRM1 protein, humanReceptors, Opioid, muTryptophan Hydroxylasefecal incontinencegenetic interactionneuromodulationplaceboPTNS

Identifiers

PMID40073917
PMCPMC12353591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.