ArticleThe Knee2025
A machine learning approach using gait parameters to cluster TKA subjects into stable and unstable joints for discovery analysis.
Article in The Knee, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient-reported joint instability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is difficult to quantify objectively. Here, we apply machine learning to cluster TKA subjects using nine literature-proposed gait parameters as knee instability predictors and explore cluster reliability and consistency with self-organizing map (SOM) and k-means computation.
methodsSubjects with TKA were retrieved from a data repository, supplemented by TKA patients with self-reported knee instability. Healthy elderly subjects, serving as control group for gait features, were added as well. All subjects have undergone identical gait analysis testing. Gait parameters (in singularity or combination) were used to cluster subjects using SOM and k-means and to identify the best split. Once clustered, comparisons between groups were performed.
resultsFrom all gait parameter combinations tried across the 91 TKA subjects, dynamic joint stiffness (DJS) was the single parameter that gave high reliability, was reasonably consistent, and singularly clustered all but one of the known unstable subjects. This TKA cluster, which contained 11 presumably unstable subjects, showed higher DJS (0.57) than the cluster containing the remaining TKA subjects (0.23). Interestingly, the latter had a DJS similar to that of the 34 healthy subjects (0.24). Additionally, during swing, the cluster with the presumably unstable subjects exhibited lower antero-posterior motion with a higher-than-normal biceps/rectus femoris activity ratio.
conclusionUsing machine learning, DJS emerged as the most powerful variable to cluster TKA subjects into presumably stable and unstable groups based on gait. Future hypothesis driven, prospective research has to verify the observations made in this retrospective discovery work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.