Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40073393›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2025

Exploring the Views of Young People, Including Those With a History of Self-Harm, on the Use of Their Routinely Generated Data for Mental Health Research: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Dana Dekel, Amanda Marchant, Marcos Del Pozo Banos, Mohamed Mhereeg, Sze Chim Lee, Ann John

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dana Dekel *Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0137-5149
Amanda Marchant *Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7013-6980
Marcos Del Pozo BanosSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1502-389X
Mohamed MhereegSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1241-9549
Sze Chim LeeSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5822-6633
Ann JohnSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5657-6995

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecondary use of routinely collected health care data has great potential benefits in epidemiological studies primarily due to the large scale of preexisting data.

objectiveThis study aimed to engage respondents with and without a history of self-harm, gain insight into their views on the use of their data for research, and determine whether there were any differences in opinions between the 2 groups.

methodsWe examined young people's views on the use of their routinely collected data for mental health research through a web-based survey, evaluating any differences between those with and without a history of self-harm.

resultsA total of 1765 respondents aged 16 to 24 years were included. Respondents' views were mostly positive toward the use and linkage of their data for research purposes for public benefit, particularly with regard to the use of health care data (mental health or otherwise), and generally echoed existing evidence on the opinions of older age groups. Individuals who reported a history of self-harm and subsequently contacted health services more often reported being "extremely likely" or "likely" to share mental health data (contacted: 209/609, 34.3%; 95% CI 28.0-41.2; not contacted: 169/782, 21.6%; 95% CI 15.8-28.7) and physical health data (contacted: 117/609, 19.2%; 95% CI 12.7-27.8; not contacted: 96/782, 12.3%; 95% CI 6.7-20.9) compared with those who had not contacted services. Respondents were overall less likely to want to share their social media data, which they considered to be more personal compared to their health care data. Respondents stressed the importance of anonymity and the need for an appropriate ethical framework.

conclusionsYoung people are aware, and they care about how their data are being used and for what purposes, irrespective of having a history of self-harm. They are largely positive about the use of health care data (mental or physical) for research and generally echo the opinions of older age groups raising issues around data security and the use of data for the public interest.

Indexed as

Mental HealthSelf-Injurious BehaviorAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInternetMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultbig datamental healthself-harmsurveyyouth

Identifiers

PMID40073393
PMCPMC11947630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.