ArticleAmerican journal of public health2025
Navigating Dual-Harm: Integrating Self- and Other-Harm Into Public Health Inquiry.
Article in American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-attack crisis indicators in mass shooters: Differences across no-, single-, and dual-harm groups.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
- Self- and other-harm in mass shooters: A dual-harm analysis.Psychiatry research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dual-harm, the co-occurrence of self- and other-harm, recognizes the overlap between these outcomes of aggressive behavior and their potential shared causes. Little progress has been made in preventing and responding to dual-harm in the broader population, and it remains understudied in public health research. We posit that the scientific investigation of dual-harm would greatly benefit from the application of public health principles and methods. In this essay, we operationalize dual-harm as a public health problem and identify gaps in knowledge, addressing its conceptual and definitional issues, prevalence estimates, methodological considerations, theoretical foundations, risk factors, and prevention strategies. We also offer a series of recommendations to advance dual-harm study and challenge the notion of conflating nonfatal dual-harm with homicide-suicide as part of a continuum, arguing that they are distinct phenomena. We identify the need for epidemiological studies to characterize those engaging in dual-harm and better understand their mechanisms and outcomes, focusing on adolescence as a critical developmental period. Future studies should develop, implement, and evaluate targeted intervention and preventive efforts for individuals involved in or at risk for dual-harm. (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.