ArticleScience advances2025
Spatial 3D genome organization reveals intratumor heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma samples.
Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial chromatin architecture and accessibility co-profiling of mammalian tissues.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Multi-sampling allows intra-tumoral heterogeneity querying and vulnerability profiling in glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Origins and consequences of oncogenic 3D chromatin remodelling.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- Cancer Heterogeneity and Cancer Cell Plasticity: Molecular Mechanisms and Precision Therapy.MedComm · 2026Review
- Structure Variations and 3D Genome Disruption: Implications in Safety of hPSC-Based Cell Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A Genomically Tailored Multiagent Precision Medicine Clinical Trial for Adults with Recurrent Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- PDS5A and TOP2B cooperate for chromatin recruitment via CTCF.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Redefining the immune microenvironment of gliomas in the era of single-cell genomics.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- 3D spatial sampling to quantify morphologic heterogeneity in isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype glioblastoma.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2025Article
- 3D Genome Architecture in Stem Cell Lineage Commitment: from Structural Organization to Precision Regulation.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent malignant brain tumor with poor prognosis. Although chromatin intratumoral heterogeneity is a characteristic feature of GBM, most current studies are conducted at a single tumor site. To investigate the GBM-specific 3D genome organization and its heterogeneity, we conducted Hi-C experiments in 21 GBM samples from nine patients, along with three normal brain samples. We identified genome subcompartmentalization and chromatin interactions specific to GBM, as well as extensive intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity at these levels. We identified copy number variants (CNVs) and structural variations (SVs) and demonstrated how they disrupted 3D genome structures. SVs could not only induce enhancer hijacking but also cause the loss of enhancers to the same gene, both of which contributed to gene dysregulation. Our findings provide insights into the GBM-specific 3D genome organization and the intratumoral heterogeneity of this organization and open avenues for understanding this devastating disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.