ArticlePloS one2025
Research and analysis of differential gene expression in CD34 hematopoietic stem cells in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to investigate and analyze the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CD34 + hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) through bioinformatics analysis, with the ultimate goal of uncovering the potential molecular mechanisms underlying pathogenesis of MDS. The findings of this study are expected to provide novel insights into clinical treatment strategies for MDS.
methodsInitially, we downloaded three datasets, GSE81173, GSE4619, and GSE58831, from the public Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database as our training sets, and selected the GSE19429 dataset as the validation set. To ensure data consistency and comparability, we standardized the training sets and removed batch effects using the ComBat algorithm, thereby integrating them into a unified gene expression dataset. Subsequently, we conducted differential expression analysis to identify genes with significant changes in expression levels across different disease states. In order to enhance prediction accuracy, we incorporated six common predictive models and trained them based on the filtered differential gene expression dataset. After comprehensive evaluation, we ultimately selected three algorithms-Lasso regression, random forest, and support vector machine (SVM)-as our core predictive models. To more precisely pinpoint genes closely related to disease characteristics, we utilized the aforementioned three machine learning methods for prediction and took the intersection of these prediction results, yielding a more robust list of genes associated with disease features. Following this, we conducted in-depth analysis of these key genes in the training set and validated the results independently using the GSE19429 dataset. Furthermore, we performed differential analysis of gene groups, co-expression analysis, and enrichment analysis to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying the roles of these genes in disease initiation and progression. Through these analyses, we aim to provide new insights and foundations for disease diagnosis and treatment. Figure illustrates the data preprocessing and analysis workflow of this study.
resultsOur analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) revealed significant differences in gene expression patterns compared to the control group (individuals without MDS). Specifically, the expression levels of two key genes, IRF4 and ELANE, were notably downregulated in CD34+ HSCs of MDS patients, indicating their downregulatory roles in the pathological process of MDS.
conclusionThis study sheds light on the potential molecular mechanisms underlying MDS, with a particular focus on the pivotal roles of IRF4 and ELANE as key pathogenic genes. Our findings provide a novel perspective for understanding the complexity of MDS and exploring therapeutic strategies. They may also guide the development of precise and effective treatments, such as targeted interventions directed against these genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.