ArticlePloS one2025
The territorialization of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome and its socioeconomic, demographic and public health policy risk factors in Belém, state of Pará, Eastern Amazon, Brazil: a cross-sectional and ecological study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome is an important public health problem in Brazil due to the large number of cases. It has a high mortality rate related to risk factors that include systemic arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, male gender and advanced age. This cross-sectional and ecological study analyzed the spatial distribution of this disease related to the evolution of COVID-19 cases and their epidemiological, demographic, socioeconomic and public health policy conditions in the administrative districts of Belém, state of Pará, in the eastern Brazilian Amazon, from 2021 to 2023. Data from the Ministry of Health, the National Institute for Space Research and the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics were used. The statistical and spatial analysis of the data used the chi-square test of equal expected proportions with a significance level of 0.05% and the techniques of ordinary multivariate linear regression and percentiles, with the results expressed by means of choropleth maps, using the Bioestat 5.4 and Arcgis 10.5.1 software. The epidemiological profile analyzed 3,511 cases, following the national pattern with statistical significance. The pathology was not distributed homogeneously in spatial terms and was associated with a territorial and socioeconomic segregation of the population in the neighborhoods and their administrative districts, with great differences in their demographic characteristics, living conditions and public services for treating the disease, especially when we consider the relationship between the outskirts and the center of the municipality. This has revealed unequal development, which has produced health inequalities in the study area. With that in mind, we emphasize the urgency of expanding these services in the places identified as most vulnerable, with a view to equal care access for the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.