ArticlePloS one2025
Microfluidic isolation and release of live disseminated breast tumor cells in bone marrow.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer represents a significant therapeutic challenge due to its aggressive nature and resistance to treatment. A major cause of treatment failure in breast cancer is the presence of rare, low-proliferative disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in distant organs including the bone marrow. This study introduced a microfluidic-based approach to improve the immunodetection and isolation of these rare DTCs for downstream analysis, with an emphasis on optimizing immunocapture, release, and enrichment methods of live DTCs as compared to the standard approach for blood-borne circulating tumor cells (CTCs). EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) and EpCAM (epithelial cell adhesion molecule), two key cell surface markers in breast cancer, were validated as efficient cell capture targets for DTCs within microfluidic chambers. Furthermore, we demonstrated that a combination of 0.25% trypsin and impulse was the most effective for releasing captured cells, maintaining high viability, and preserving essential cellular characteristics. Using a metastatic mouse breast cancer model, we achieved a 47.9-fold enrichment of live DTCs. Analysis of blood and bone marrow samples obtained from a breast cancer patient with minimal residual disease at two timepoints revealed a reduction in CTCs and an increase in DTCs following adjuvant chemotherapy. This observation suggested a potential dynamic interplay between CTCs and DTCs in response to therapy. Our results underscore the potential of the microfluidic approach in enhancing DTC detection and shed light on the importance of monitoring both CTCs and DTCs in breast cancer prognosis and treatment response assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.