ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Understanding the expectations, positions and ambitions of LMICs during pandemic treaty negotiations, and the factors contributing to them.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 'I Think From the Beginning, the Ambitions Were Compromised': A Case Study of COVAX as Vaccine Equity Policy Operationalisation.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global South countries account for two-thirds of WHO Member States and are a crucial voice in negotiating the 'pandemic treaty', which Member States agreed was necessary if the world was to avoid a repeat of the significant inequity that resulted during COVID-19. The negotiation of a pandemic treaty presents an opportunity to recalibrate global health systems and processes for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response. However, for this to eventuate through global solidarity, as many Global South countries have said they expect, then concessions by developed states on issues that they have long protected must occur. It remains to be seen whether the negotiations amount to a rebalancing of power and resources to substantially improve our capacity and capability to address global health threats. Further, while these issues have often been viewed through a dualistic lens between developing and developed countries, these negotiations also reflect the diversity of Global South Member States, some of which are strong voices in, and for, coalitions. Drawing on content analysis techniques, this research describes how Global South countries articulate their expectations, positions and ambitions during treaty negotiations in the lead up to the World Health Assembly in 2024 and discusses exogenous and endogenous factors that contribute to these positions. The analysis found that the pursuit of equity is galvanising for Global South countries, as are their ambitions for the multilateral system not to drive further inequity through the asymmetry of power and influence exercised by developed states. Well-coordinated collective positions from Global South countries in negotiations to date have resulted in traction on contested issues such as technology transfer, production capability, and access and benefits. Additionally, some Global South countries have also used these negotiations to pursue national interests whilst maintaining collective positions in pursuit of equity and global solidarity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.