Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072968›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Systemic transphobia and ongoing barriers to healthcare for transgender and nonbinary people: A historical analysis of #TransHealthFail.

Allison J McLaughlin, Saren Nonoyama, Lauren Glupe, Jordon D Bosse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allison J McLaughlinInstitute for Health Equity and Social Justice, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0261-4770
Saren NonoyamaInstitute for Health Equity and Social Justice, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3270-8310
Lauren GlupeInstitute for Health Equity and Social Justice, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9160-8115
Jordon D BosseInstitute for Health Equity and Social Justice, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3547-9077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transgender (T+) people report negative healthcare experiences such as being misgendered, pathologizing gender, and gatekeeping care, as well as treatment refusal. Less is known about T+ patients' perceptions of interrelated factors associated with, and consequences of, negative experiences. The purpose of this analysis was to explore T+ patients' negative healthcare experiences through Twitter posts using the hashtag #transhealthfail. Publicly available Tweets published between July 2015 and November 2021 from US-based Twitter accounts were collected via Mozdeh. Tweets were deductively analyzed for content using a list of a-priori codes developed from existing literature. Additional codes were developed as new ideas emerged from the data. When possible, type of care location, providers interacted with, and initial reason for seeking care were extracted. Each Tweet was coded by at least two team members using NVivo12. A total of 1,340 tweets from 652 unique Twitter users were analyzed. Negative experiences were reported across healthcare settings and professional types, with physicians, nurses, and counselors/therapists being named most frequently. Primary antecedents of negative healthcare experiences and barriers to accessing care were related to health insurance issues and providers' lack of knowledge, discomfort, and binary gender beliefs. Negative healthcare interactions led T+ patients to perceive receiving a different standard of care and having unmet needs, which could lead to delaying/avoiding care in the future. As such, these results highlight the potential for direct and indirect harm related to providers' specific actions. Patient strategies to prevent and/or manage negative encounters and care facilitators were also identified. A multi-pronged approach addressing healthcare policy, improving knowledge and attitudes of healthcare providers and ancillary staff, and creating clinical settings that are physically and psychologically safe for T+ patients is critical to improving the healthcare experiences, and ultimately health, of T+ people.

Identifiers

PMID40072968
PMCPMC11902059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.