Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072926›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025

The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review.

Rabie Adel El Arab, Omayma Abdulaziz Al Moosa, Fuad H Abuadas, Joel Somerville

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. AI-Based Learning Experiences of Nursing Students: A Qualitative Study.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Producing Mobility, Withholding Authority: Epistemic Drain and Nursing Sovereignty in Nepal.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rabie Adel El ArabAlmoosa College of Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3822-9236
Omayma Abdulaziz Al MoosaAlmoosa College of Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7112-6280
Fuad H AbuadasDepartment of Community Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4880-0862
Joel SomervilleInverness College, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8728-0687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming health care, offering substantial advancements in patient care, clinical workflows, and nursing education.

objectiveThis umbrella review aims to evaluate the integration of AI into nursing practice and education, with a focus on ethical and social implications, and to propose evidence-based recommendations to support the responsible and effective adoption of AI technologies in nursing.

methodsWe included systematic reviews, scoping reviews, rapid reviews, narrative reviews, literature reviews, and meta-analyses focusing on AI integration in nursing, published up to October 2024. A new search was conducted in January 2025 to identify any potentially eligible reviews published thereafter. However, no new reviews were found. Eligibility was guided by the Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type framework; databases (PubMed or MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, and IEEE Xplore) were searched using comprehensive keywords. Two reviewers independently screened records and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed with Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) and A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2 (AMSTAR 2), which we adapted for systematic and nonsystematic review types. A thematic synthesis approach, conducted independently by 2 reviewers, identified recurring patterns across the included reviews.

resultsThe search strategy yielded 18 eligible studies after screening 274 records. These studies encompassed diverse methodologies and focused on nursing professionals, students, educators, and researchers. First, ethical and social implications were consistently highlighted, with studies emphasizing concerns about data privacy, algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability, and the necessity for equitable access to AI technologies. Second, the transformation of nursing education emerged as a critical area, with an urgent need to update curricula by integrating AI-driven educational tools and fostering both technical competencies and ethical decision-making skills among nursing students and professionals. Third, strategies for integration were identified as essential for effective implementation, calling for scalable models, robust ethical frameworks, and interdisciplinary collaboration, while also addressing key barriers such as resistance to AI adoption, lack of standardized AI education, and disparities in technology access.

conclusionsAI holds substantial promises for revolutionizing nursing practice and education. However, realizing this potential necessitates a strategic approach that addresses ethical concerns, integrates AI literacy into nursing curricula, and ensures equitable access to AI technologies. Limitations of this review include the heterogeneity of included studies and potential publication bias. Our findings underscore the need for comprehensive ethical frameworks and regulatory guidelines tailored to nursing applications, updated nursing curricula to include AI literacy and ethical training, and investments in infrastructure to promote equitable AI access. Future research should focus on developing standardized implementation strategies and evaluating the long-term impacts of AI integration on nursing practice and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEducation, NursingHumansAI integrationAI literacyartificial intelligenceethical frameworksethical implicationsnursing educationnursing practicesocial implications

Identifiers

PMID40072926
PMCPMC12008698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.