Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072917›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2025

Development of the Follow-Up Discourse Observation Protocol (FUDOP) for Characterizing Instructor Active Learning Follow-Up Behaviors.

Xinjian Cen, Maci Kight, Rachel Lee, Petra Kranzfelder, Stanley M Lo, Jeffrey Maloy, Melinda T Owens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xinjian CenDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Maci KightDepartment of Neurobiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Rachel LeeDepartment of Neurobiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Petra KranzfelderDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93117.
Stanley M LoDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Jeffrey MaloyDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Melinda T OwensDepartment of Neurobiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instructors often provide feedback to their class in multiple ways. One way is through their follow-up behaviors, which are the specific strategies instructors implement after active learning activities. These behaviors could play an important role in student learning as students receive feedback from the instructor. However, there is little research on the effects of different types of follow-up behaviors. Follow-up after active learning can be seen as a form of discourse between the instructor and the entire class. Previous researchers developed the Classroom Discourse Observation Protocol (CDOP) to analyze discourse between the instructor and individual students or small groups. We used CDOP as a starting point to develop and validate a new protocol, the Follow-Up Discourse Observation Protocol (FUDOP), to characterize instructional follow-up behaviors to the entire class after active-learning activities. We then used FUDOP to characterize follow-up behaviors of multiple instructors in introductory biology courses at three different universities. We measured consistent differences in these behaviors across instructors but not within instructors, demonstrating that instructors may engage in consistent follow-up behaviors. FUDOP could allow instructors and researchers to better measure and analyze follow-up behaviors and their effects, which could in turn provide guidance to instructors and faculty developers.

Indexed as

FacultyProblem-Based LearningFollow-Up StudiesHumansStudentsTeaching

Identifiers

PMID40072917
PMCPMC12286634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.