Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072823›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2025

Minimal Residual Disease in Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Ioannis Kournoutas, Brittany L Siontis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Circulating Biomarkers in Sarcoma.Current oncology reports · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ioannis KournoutasDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Brittany L SiontisDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. siontis.brittany@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementLiquid biopsies represent a promising and minimally invasive approach to diagnosing and monitoring cancer. In recent years, studies across a multitude of solid organ malignancies have suggested the clinical utility of biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Particular attention has been given to serial assessment of such biomarkers in an effort to detect minimal residual disease (MRD), in order to predict which patients may be at highest risk of relapse following curative-intent surgical or medical intervention. Such investigations are particularly relevant to sarcomas, which are highly heterogeneous malignancies and commonly develop treatment resistance. While preliminary research described herein is promising, there remain key barriers to widespread adoption of liquid biopsy in sarcoma, including the lack of standardized detection methods, high cost, and the need for large, prospective studies to validate their clinical utility. Given the high level of interest in liquid biopsy in the biomedical community, it is plausible such obstacles may be overcome in the near future. With such advancements, one can anticipate that liquid biopsies may become a key tool in the sarcoma oncologists armamentarium, and offer a path toward improved outcomes for patients with sarcoma.

Indexed as

SarcomaBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADisease ManagementHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm, ResidualPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNABiomarkersCtDNADisease monitoringLiquid biopsy, sarcomaMinimal residual disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.