Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072814›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2025

Decriminalization undone: Assessing the amendment to British Columbia's decriminalization of personal drug possession framework.

Kelsey A Speed, Kat Gallant, Mathew Fleury, Erica McAdam, Tyson Singh Kelsall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Responding to the toxic drug crisis: Promising innovations, gaps, and calls to action.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelsey A SpeedInterdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. kelsey.speed@bccsu.ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-5728-5209
Kat GallantInterdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-6779-0086
Mathew FleuryFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-4588-4033
Erica McAdamInterdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-6595-6883
Tyson Singh KelsallFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-7995-9483

Funding

CIHR F22-03575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Province of British Columbia (BC) is in the midst of an ongoing public health emergency, declared in 2016 in response to significant levels of drug poisonings/overdoses stemming from the unregulated drug supply. In response, BC implemented decriminalization in 2023, removing criminal sanctions for adults possessing up to 2.5 cumulative grams of opioids, cocaine, methamphetamine, and MDMA. Approximately 15 months later, BC amended their decriminalization framework, effectively re-criminalizing public drug consumption and possession in public spaces across BC to prioritize safety to an undefined "public" over the health and safety of people who are structurally marginalized by dominant, intersecting systems of power. This commentary assesses BC's amended decriminalization framework through a public health lens, to examine how this unbalanced prioritization of "public safety" (as defined by law enforcement bodies) contributes to health and social inequities. By focusing on the (1) discursive exclusion of members of the public who already endure structural marginalization in the weaponization of "public safety," (2) escalation of efforts to displace these groups from public spaces, and (3) opportunity costs of law enforcement prioritization, we argue that BC's most recent drug policy shift is incompatible with its stated goal of balancing public safety and public health.

Indexed as

Drug and Narcotic ControlDrug TraffickingIllicit DrugsBritish ColumbiaHumansPublic HealthIllicit DrugsHarm reductionPublic healthPublic policySocial determinants of healthSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID40072814
PMCPMC12382334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.