ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Racial Disparities in Doctor-Patient Communication: Examining Doctors' Encounters with Black and White Patients.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining Barriers to Cancer Care: A Needs Assessment of African American and Black African Immigrants in Iowa.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- The Intergroup Time Bias and Its Implications for Medical Healthcare.The Journal of social issues · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Healthcare disparities persist in the USA, with Black patients often receiving lower-quality care. Effective doctor-patient communication is crucial for influencing satisfaction, adherence to treatment, and overall health outcomes. This study examined racial disparities in doctor-patient communication, focusing on encounters with Black and White patients recently diagnosed with myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS). Thirty-seven oncologists participated in simulated encounters with trained actors portraying either Black or White patients. Using an innovative approach combining the comparison of communication characteristics, thematic content, and linguistic analyses, we observed significant disparities in time allocation, linguistic complexity, and relation-building efforts. Encounters with Black patients were notably shorter, with doctors using fewer words per sentence, asking fewer questions, and employing less inclusive and optimistic language. Doctors also had less thorough discussions about transplant options and used fewer words communicating authenticity when talking with Black patients. The post-encounter surveys revealed that doctors were not aware of their shortcomings when interacting with Black patients. The findings provide important insights for the development of training programs aimed at improving healthcare outcomes for marginalized communities and reducing racial healthcare disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40072799What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.