ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2025
Early Recurrence of Colorectal Liver Metastasis (Number ≤ 5 and Largest Diameter ≤ 3 cm) after Resection or Thermal Ablation: a Multi-center Study of Patterns, Safety, Survival and Risk Factors.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Thermal ablation versus liver resection for small colorectal liver metastases (≤ 3 cm): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and propensity score-matched studies.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- An interpretable machine learning model based on MRI radiomics and GAME score for predicting early recurrence after thermal ablation in colorectal liver metastases.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare early recurrence patterns, safety, survival and investigate the clinical risk factors of early recurrence (ER) after liver resection or thermal ablation (TA) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) with number ≤ 5 and largest diameter ≤ 3 cm. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included patients with CRLM who underwent liver resection or TA between January 2016 and December 2021 at two hospitals in China. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to assess recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Risk factors for ER were analysed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.
results303 patients with 632 liver metastases were enrolled. The most common early recurrence pattern was intrahepatic recurrence (IHR) in resection group and TA group. There was no significant difference in 6-month RFS rate (65.81% vs 66.23%) and median OS (P = 0.10) between two groups. Patients without ER had better OS than those with ER (P < 0.05). The incidence of serious complications (P = 0.013), length of hospitalization (P < 0.01), and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score (P = 0.038) in TA group were significantly better than resection group. The diameter of liver metastases (HR: 4.89, 95% CI: 1.16-20.60; P = 0.031) and clinical risk score (CRS) (HR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.06-3.25; P = 0.029) were independent risk factors for ER.
conclusionFor CRLM with largest diameter ≤ 3 cm and number ≤ 5, the efficacy of receiving resection or TA is comparable, and the safety of TA is better. TA may be considered as the first-line local treatment option for patients with CRLM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40072796What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.