ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2025
Terminal spin labeling of xylotriose strongly affects interactions in the active site of xylanase BcX.
Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paramagnetic probes provide long-range distance information and report on minor conformations of biomacromolecules. However, it is important to realize that any probe can affect the system of interest. Here, we report on the effects of attaching a small nitroxide spin label [TEMPO, (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl] to xylotriose, a substrate of the enzyme xylanase from Bacillus circulans (BcX). BcX has a long and narrow active site cleft accommodating six xylose units and a secondary binding site on its surface. The aim of the study was to probe the interactions of the substrate with the enzyme using paramagnetic relaxation enhancements (PREs). Binding of the substrate to the surface exposed secondary binding site resulted in strong and localized PREs, indicative of well-defined binding. The xylotriose with diamagnetic control tag was still able to bind the active site cleft, though the rate of exchange was reduced relative to that of untagged xylotriose. The substrate with the paramagnetic TEMPO was not able to bind inside the active site cleft. Also, additional interactions on another surface location showed differences between the paramagnetic substrate and the diamagnetic control, despite the minimal chemical differences between TEMPO modified xylotriose and its reduced, diamagnetic counterpart. Our findings underscore the sensitivity of BcX substrate binding to minor substrate modifications. This study serves as a reminder that any probe, including the attachment of a small paramagnetic group, can affect the behavior of the system under investigation. Even the chemical difference between a paramagnetic tag and its diamagnetic control can result in differences in the molecular interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.