Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072765›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2025

Risk Factors for Intrahepatic Distant Recurrence After Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Yuki Tsuji, Tadashi Namisaki, Hiroaki Takaya, Naoki Nishimura, Ryuichi Noguchi, Shohei Asada, Akihiko Shibamoto, Takahiro Kubo, Satoshi Iwai, Fumimasa Tomooka and 13 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predictors of True Early Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  3. Refining Risk Stratification for Post-RFA HCC Recurrence.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Yuki TsujiDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Tadashi NamisakiDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan. tadashin@naramed-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3158-5318
Hiroaki TakayaDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Naoki Nishimura
Ryuichi NoguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Shohei AsadaDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Akihiko ShibamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Takahiro KuboDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Satoshi IwaiDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Fumimasa TomookaDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Aritoshi KoizumiDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Takuya MatsudaDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Misako TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Nobuyuki YoriokaDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Takashi InoueDepartment of Evidence-Based Medicine, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Yukihisa FujinagaDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Norihisa NishimuraDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Koh KitagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Shinya SatoDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Kosuke KajiDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Kiyoshi AsadaClinical Research Center, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Akira MitoroDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Hitoshi YoshijiDepartment of Gastroenterology of Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe incidence of intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still remains high after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). However, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has insufficient screening power. This study aimed to identify risk factors for IDR in patients with post-RFA HCC.

methodA total of 112 patients with early-stage HCC who underwent RFA were divided into the IDR (n = 51) and non-IDR groups (n = 61). Serum samples were analyzed within 2 months after RFA.

resultsThe mean follow-up duration was 30.1 months. The recurrence-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 20.8%, 42.4%, and 54.2%, respectively. The 1- and 5-year overall survival rates were 97.3% and 87.3%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR, hazard ratio (HR) 2.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.44-3.99] and lens culinaris agglutinin a-reactive fraction of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP-L3, (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.04) were independently associated with post-RFA IDR. The cumulative recurrence rates at 5 years in the high NLR (≥ 2.24) and high AFP-L3 (≥ 0.2 ng/mL) groups were significantly higher than those in the low NLR (< 2.24) and low AFP-L3 (< 0.2 ng/mL) groups, respectively. The predictive accuracies of NLR, AFP-L3, and a composite index based on AFP-L3, and NLR for IDR were 66.2% (37.3% sensitivity, 95.1% specificity), 64.3% (47.1% sensitivity, 80.3% specificity), and 75.6% (68.6% sensitivity, 75.4% specificity), respectively.

conclusionThe combined model had significantly better prediction performance than either NLR or AFP-L3 alone. The NLR combined with an absolute AFP-L3 level is an effective marker for IDR in patients with post-RFA HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiofrequency AblationAgedalpha-FetoproteinsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeutrophilsRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsalpha-FetoproteinsAFP-L3Heterotopic recurrenceNLRRadiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.