ArticleDiscover oncology2025
LST1 expression correlates with immune infiltration and predicts poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extended HLA haplotypes and transplant survival.Blood · 2026Article
- Prognostic heterogeneity in ASXL1-mutated AML and refinement by an immunophenotype-based score.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) poses significant challenges due to its poor prognosis and heterogeneous nature. Discovering new biomarkers is crucial for improving risk assessment and customizing treatment approaches. While leukocyte-specific transcript 1 (LST1) is implicated in inflammation and immune regulation, its function in AML remains ambiguous. In this investigation, we conduct a comprehensive investigation into LST1 expression profiles, clinical implications, functional pathways, and immune interactions in AML, leveraging multi-omics data and experimental validations. Our examination shows increased levels of LST1 expression in AML when compared to regular hematopoietic tissues, a discovery validated by RT-qPCR and Western blot analyses in a separate group. Elevated LST1 levels correlate with distinct clinicopathological features, including increased white blood cell counts, non-M3 FAB subtype, and intermediate/poor cytogenetic risk. Importantly, heightened LST1 levels predict unfavorable overall survival outcomes across various subgroups, independently of age and cytogenetic risk. We develop an integrative nomogram incorporating LST1 expression, demonstrating robust prognostic efficacy for patient survival. Transcriptomic profiling identifies 275 differentially expressed genes between LST1-high and -low AML cases, enriched in cytokine signaling, immune modulation, cell adhesion, and oncogenic pathways. Furthermore, LST1 exhibits significant associations with the infiltration of diverse immune cell subsets within the AML microenvironment, particularly myeloid cells and regulatory T cells (Tregs). In conclusion, our study establishes LST1 as a novel prognostic indicator with immunological relevance in AML, emphasizing its potential therapeutic implications. Further mechanistic elucidation of LST1 in AML pathogenesis is crucial for its clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.