Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072757›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2025

Assessment of the endectocide efficacy of a pour-on topical solution containing fluazuron, fipronil and eprinomectin in cattle.

Daniel Pacheco de Melo, Carolina Buzzulini, Gustavo Felippelli, Lucas Vinícius Costa Gomes, Laís Aparecida Torres, Pedro Vale Moreira, Gabriele Zaine Teixeira Debortoli, Thaís Rabelo Dos Santos-Doni, Alvimar José da Costa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel Pacheco de MeloFaculdade de Ciências Agrarias e Veterinária (FCAV), Universidade Estadual de São Paulo (Unesp), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil.
Carolina BuzzuliniIPESA- Instituto de Pesquisa em Saúde Animal, Formiga, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Gustavo FelippelliUniversidade Estadual de São Paulo (Unesp), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária (FMVA), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brasil.
Lucas Vinícius Costa GomesFaculdade de Ciências Agrarias e Veterinária (FCAV), Universidade Estadual de São Paulo (Unesp), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil.
Laís Aparecida TorresUnião Química Farmacêutica Nacional S/A, São Paulo, Brasil.
Pedro Vale MoreiraUnião Química Farmacêutica Nacional S/A, São Paulo, Brasil.
Gabriele Zaine Teixeira DebortoliInstituto de Ciências Agrárias (ICA), Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Avenida Universitária, Unaí, Minas Gerais, 1000, Brasil.
Thaís Rabelo Dos Santos-DoniInstituto de Ciências Agrárias (ICA), Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Avenida Universitária, Unaí, Minas Gerais, 1000, Brasil. rabelo.vet@hotmail.com.
Alvimar José da CostaFaculdade de Ciências Agrarias e Veterinária (FCAV), Universidade Estadual de São Paulo (Unesp), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a new formulation composed of the chemical active ingredients benzoylphenylurea, phenylpyrazole and macrocyclic lactone, which have different mechanisms of action on the most important parasites, such as R. microplus, H. irritans, D. hominis larvae, C. hominivorax larvae and nematodes. The six experiments were conducted in Formiga (Bananal and Bela Vista farms) in the Center-West region of Minas Gerais, Brazil. This study introduces a new topical formulation containing 3.0% Fluazuron, 1.25% Fipronil, and 0.5% Eprinomectin, which has demonstrated high efficacy against R. microplus in both natural (97%) and experimental (95%) infestations. Additionally, the formulation was effective as a larvicide against D. hominis (98%) and C. hominivorax (100%), as well as against H. irritans (98%) and as an anthelmintic (97%). Its broad-spectrum activity and prolonged efficacy make it a tool for managing parasitic infestations in cattle. However, the potential for resistance development and the need for strategic application highlight the importance of integrated control programs that combine chemical and nonchemical approaches to ensure sustainable parasite management.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesInsecticidesIvermectinPhenylurea CompoundsPyrazolesAdministration, TopicalAnimalsAnthelminticsBrazilCattleLarvaAnthelminticseprinomectinfipronilfluazuronInsecticidesIvermectinPhenylurea CompoundsPyrazolesAntiparasitic agentsCattle tickEctoparasitesEfficacyEndoparasitesHelminthsHorn flyMyiasisRuminants

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.