Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072752›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025

Biomarkers in gastroesophageal cancer 2025: an updated consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP).

Maria Alsina Maqueda, Ana Teijo Quintáns, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Maria Jesús Fernández Aceñero, Ana Fernández Montes, Carlos Gómez Martín, Paula Jiménez Fonseca, Carolina Martínez Ciarpaglini, Fernando Rivera Herrero, Mar Iglesias Coma

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07644455 (Evaluation of the Accuracy of Vacuum-assisted Percutaneous Biopsy in Predicting Mammary Anatomopathological Response in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07644455 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Vacuum-assisted Percutaneous Biopsy in Predicting Mammary Anatomopathological Response in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto do Cancer do Estado de São PauloRan2026 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsBreast CancerArmsPre-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Clipping, Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (VAB)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maria Alsina MaquedaMedical Oncology Department, Unidad de Oncología Médica Traslacional, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Navarrabiomed -Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. maria.alsina.maqueda@navarra.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4835-7159
Ana Teijo QuintánsPathology Department, Gastrointestinal and Neuroendocrine Tumors Research Group, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Research Institute (Imas12), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8280-8446
Miriam CuatrecasasPathology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Biomedical Research Institute IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3063-0110
Maria Jesús Fernández AceñeroDepartment of Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology, Surgical Pathology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, nstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2439-3553
Ana Fernández MontesMedical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4630-5830
Carlos Gómez MartínGastrointestinal Cancer and Early Clinical-Translational Research Units, Medical Oncology Division, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1929-0955
Paula Jiménez FonsecaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4592-3813
Carolina Martínez CiarpagliniPathology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8797-2114
Fernando Rivera HerreroMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8915-226X
Mar Iglesias ComaPathology Department, Hospital del Mar, Pompeu Fabra University, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain. miglesiasc@hmar.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2274-4671

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastroesophageal carcinomas, including gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), pose a global health challenge due to their heterogeneity. The approach to diagnosis and treatment should first differentiate between GEA and ESCC. Over the past decade, therapies for metastatic or advanced GEA/ESCC have expanded, with several new therapeutic targets alongside trastuzumab for metastatic HER2-positive GEA. Four key biomarkers are essential for targeted therapy: HER2 overexpression/amplification, deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI), PD-L1, and Claudin18.2 expression. Immunohistochemistry is the recommended method for these biomarkers evaluation. In addition, the assessment of biomarkers like FGFR2b is likely to become routine in the near future. Experts from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) have formed a consensus to optimize biomarker detection and usage in clinical practice. Their recommendations aim to improve personalized treatment strategies for GEA and ESCC patients, integrating new diagnostic insights into routine care.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaStomach NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEsophagogastric JunctionHumansMedical OncologyMicrosatellite InstabilitySocieties, MedicalSpainB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBiomarkersClaudin 18.2Gastroesophageal carcinomaHER2MSI/dMMRPD-L1

Identifiers

PMID40072752
PMCPMC12399710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.