ArticleJournal of community genetics2025
A qualitative study to evaluate the preparedness of community paediatricians for genomic medicine in England - ready for take-off?
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges associated with disclosing results from whole genome sequencing to diagnose paediatric rare diseases: analysis of parent-clinician interactions.Journal of medical genetics · 2026Article
- Integrating paediatric subspecialists into the delivery of genomic medicine: A qualitative study.Paediatrics & child health · 2026Article
- From tradition to transformation: evolving models of care in clinical genetics.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Mainstreaming genomics in the National Health Service in England: a survey to understand preparedness and confidence among paediatricians.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic medicine (GM) was mainstreamed across the National Health Service (NHS) in England in 2018. Non-genetics healthcare professionals can now incorporate genomic testing including whole genome sequencing (WGS) into their clinical practice. This study was conducted to evaluate the preparedness of community paediatricians (CPs) for GM. Semi-structured interviews, using a topic guide informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, were conducted with 17 CPs working in the NHS to explore issues related to preparedness and confidence. Data were analysed using thematic template analysis. The codebook included both inductive and deductive codes informed by the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation Behaviour model (COM-B), an implementation theory to explain behaviour change. The majority of participants perceived a net benefit from GM in terms of improving clinical management and information provision for patients and families and were receptive to using GM in their clinical practice. However, there was wide variation across trusts in CP preparedness for genomic medicine for reasons including lack of time and resources, notably workforce support. Many also lacked confidence in the skills required to deliver GM, and did not see GM as a priority. Most participants felt that they had access to GM education, but the main challenge was finding the time to engage with it. Strategies related to fiscal measures, enablement, training and education could help to address these early obstacles. Our findings may be relevant to clinicians in other non-genetic specialties integrating GM into their clinical practice not only in the UK NHS but more globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.