ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Role of RB51 vaccine in cow milk contamination of traditional milk sales centers.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Socio-economic impact of bovine brucellosis and the need for effective control strategies.Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brucellosis poses a major health and economic challenge in endemic areas, especially in Iran. This study aimed to determine the strains and epidemiological features of Brucella isolated from raw milk at traditional milk sales centers in western Iran. A total of 208 raw milk samples were collected from 104 dairy sales centers in Hamadan province during two sampling periods in 2023. The Milk Ring Test (MRT), bacterial culture, and AMOS-PCR assays were utilised to detect Brucella. MRT yielded no positive results, whereas bacterial culture detected Brucella in 9 samples (4.3%). Of these, one sample contained B. abortus biovar 3; another had both B. melitensis biovar 1 and B. abortus biovar 3, while seven samples had the RB51 vaccine strain. AMOS-PCR detected Brucella in 3.8% (8/208) of the samples. Most positive samples, mainly of the RB51 strain, were found in Hamadan, representing 44.5% of cases. MRT showed perfect specificity but no sensitivity compared to culture, while PCR demonstrated high sensitivity, specificity, and overall agreement, making it a more reliable diagnostic tool. The presence of Brucella RB51 in milk suggests that vaccinated cows may excrete the strain under certain conditions, posing a potential risk to human health if unpasteurized dairy is consumed. This emphasizes the need for better brucellosis prevention and control measures in endemic regions, particularly to protect against the risks related to consuming raw milk from vaccinated cows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40072655What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.