Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072650›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2025

Creating a Framework for Minimizing Opioid Consumption after Office Based Surgery.

Austin A Skinner, Vikranth R Chinthareddy, Richard D Urman, Fred Shapiro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Austin A SkinnerCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City University, Joplin, MO, USA. austin.skinner@kansascity.edu.
Vikranth R ChinthareddyMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Richard D UrmanThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Fred ShapiroMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHerein we review recent trends in opioid prescribing, the rise in office-based surgeries, and propose a framework to minimize opioid consumption following such procedures. RECENT

findingsOutpatient surgical procedures are increasing year over year in the United States. This observed increase is expected to continue due to the financial incentives to perform outpatient procedures. Office-based surgery is a setting that is expected to have tremendous growth. Still, currently there are scant safety guidelines concerning how to manage perioperative pain related to surgeries in this setting safely and effectively. Opioid abuse is rampant across the United States, and we anticipate that an increase in outpatient procedures will create a rise in opioid prescribing without appropriate discourse and planning. There are a variety of systematic factors in play to minimize opioid consumption after office-based surgery that must be considered at each operative phase. Careful planning and consideration of the multitude of factors can increase patient satisfaction while minimizing opioid prescriptions.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresAnalgesics, OpioidOpioid-Related DisordersPostoperative PainHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Analgesics, OpioidOffice-based SurgeryOpioid sparing Analgesia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.