ArticleEndocrine pathology2025
Methylation Profiles Differ According to Clinical Characteristics in Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Lung.
Article in Endocrine pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroendocrine tumours through an epigenetic lens: Emerging insights for diagnosis and treatment.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Review
- Three-Tier Prognostic Stratification of Lung Carcinoids (NET G1-G2-G3) by Multivariable, Data-Driven Integration of Ki-67 and Mitotic Count.Endocrine pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the lung constitute a rare entity of primary lung malignancies that often exhibit an indolent clinical course. Epigenetics-related differences have been described previously for lung NET, but the clinical significance remains unclear. In this study, we performed genome-wide methylation analysis using the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip technology on FFPE tissues from lung NET treated at two academic centers. We aimed to investigate the methylation profiles of known prognostic subgroups. In total, 54 tissue samples from primary lung NET were analyzed, of which 37 were typical carcinoids (TC) and 17 atypical carcinoids (AC). Overall, 25/53 patients (47.2%) developed metastases throughout the disease course, 14/26 (53.8%) had a positive somatostatin receptor (SSTR) scan, and 7/28 patients (25.0%) had documented endocrine activity. Analysis of the DNA methylation data showed substantial differences between TC and AC samples and revealed three distinct clusters (C1-C3): C3 (n = 29) with 100% TC and 89.7% non-metastasized, C2 (n = 22) with 63.6% AC and 95.5% metastasized, and C1 with three AC samples (2/3 metastasized). In subgroup analyses, distinct methylation patterns were observed based on histology, metastases, SSTR status, and endocrine activity. In the functional gene classification, the genes affected by differential methylation were mainly involved in cell signaling. DNA methylation could potentially aid in the diagnostic process of lung NET. The differences in methylation observed with respect to clinical features like SSTR expression and endocrine activity could translate into improved management of lung NET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.