ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Prevalence of complementary therapy use in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a cross-sectional study in China.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying immunostimulatory herbal supplements that may flare autoimmune skin diseases: a systematic scoping review.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the utilization of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among Chinese patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA), the types of CAM used, and the factors associated with its use. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. Data were collected from 503 IA patients using self-administered questionnaires and electronic medical records. Demographic, clinical, and disease activity data and pain, fatigue, emotion, and sleep quality assessments were analyzed. The study found that 50.3% of patients with IA used CAM, with herbal medicines and products being the most common therapies utilized by 74.3% of CAM users. CAM users reported significantly higher levels of fatigue, negative emotion states, and poorer sleep quality compared to non-users. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age, employment status, disease duration, IA family history, and disease activity as significant predictors of CAM use. This study revealed a high prevalence of CAM use among patients with IA in China. Healthcare professionals should enhance their understanding of CAM to inform and guide patients better and ensure the safe and effective integration of CAM therapies with conventional treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40072617What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.