ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Querying the capability of the post-HoLEP endoscopic aspect of the membranous urethral mucosa in predicting urinary incontinence: a prospective AI-based analysis.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applied trigonometry in elucidating the mechanism of post-HoLEP urinary incontinence.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Concordance among experts in assessing apical mucosal preservation during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): implications for artificial intelligence model development.World journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTransient stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) is commonly linked to intraoperative injury of the external urethral sphincter (EUS). We assessed the reliability of the post-HoLEP endoscopic appearance of the membranous urethra mucosa (MUM) in predicting post-HoLEP continence.
methodsForty HoLEPs were prospectively recorded by an artificial intelligence video platform capable of segmenting clips by surgical steps. The final clip was assessed for postoperative MUM integrity by 2 experts in HoLEP and 2 residents, all blinded to the clinical outcome. Their findings were scored as no injury, anterior injury, and lateral injury, and the results underwent statistical analyses.
resultsThe referent rating was 72% for no injury, 23% for anterior injury, and 5% for lateral injury. The overall inter-observer agreement was K = 0.26, the inter-experts' agreement was K = 0.12, and the inter-residents' agreement was K = 0.38, reflecting low inter-observer reliability. The postoperative rate of SUI, defined as any drop on a pad, was 30% at 1 month and 12.5% at 3 months. There was no association between the MUM injury graded and SUI according to any of the evaluators (univariate analysis OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.17-3.89). A multivariate analysis controlling for age, prostate size, resectoscope size (22 vs. 26 FR), surgery time, and use of final fulguration showed no significantly independent predictor of post-HoLEP-related incontinence.
conclusionThe post-HoLEP endoscopic appearance of the MUM is apparently not a reliable marker of EUS injury. Further studies are needed to better understand the mechanism underlying post-HoLEP SUI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40072587What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.